Teams are ranked by two different categories: TOTAL POINTS and AVERAGE PER PLAYER
TOTAL RANKINGS:
RANK | TEAM | COMMITS | CFC 100 | TOTAL |
1 | Waterloo | 62 | 0 | 834 |
2 | McGill | 51 | 3 | 775 |
3 | Western | 27 | 8 | 750 |
4 | Guelph | 39 | 3 | 740 |
5 | Calgary | 40 | 4 | 670 |
AVERAGE PER PLAYER:
RANK | TEAM | COMMITS | CFC 100 | TOTAL | avg / player |
1 | Carleton | 23 | 8 | 640 | 27.83 |
2 | Western | 27 | 8 | 750 | 27.78 |
3 | Laval | 24 | 4 | 645 | 26.88 |
4 | UBC | 26 | 7 | 660 | 25.38 |
5 | Manitoba | 24 | 4 | 595 | 24.20 |
Become a ‘CFC INSIDER’ to view #6 through #27
UPDATE August 24
CFC employs a point system based on the recruits declared in the recruiting class on CFC
- Schools declare recruits at different times of year (i.e. Quebec schools recruit most in January, higher academic school entries are later, etc) so make sure you equate the amount of recruits with the point system
- Schools must have 5 players on their commit list in order to be ranked
- Players are rated based on (a) CFC100 ranking (b) 4-star ranking (c) 3-star ranking (d) all other players get a NR
Advocating for football prospects one story at a time.